 | Edition 2484 |
|
|
Mentioned in today’s edition: Meta, Ben Thompson, SpaceX, Android, Duolingo, Microsoft, Threads and the iPhone 17. Plus, deals on ASUS desktops, Soundpeats earbuds and Govee TV backlights. |
The News |
Social media researchers not disclosing tech company links |
Close to a third of scientists with social media-related research published in mainstream journals aren't properly disclosing ties to tech companies, a new paper claims (Science). A pre-print article analysing 300 of the most cited papers since 2010 found that half of them had a connection to social media companies, but only 20% declared it (arxiv). |
The Sizzle: This gets to a really thorny issue in science and tech. Researchers are encouraged by universities to collaborate with industry, but sometimes this involvement is used to claim they're not independent. Some experts I spoke to during the teen social media ban were painted as shills for their unpaid involvement in social media companies’ academic advisory boards. At the same time, tech companies (and other industries) do have an incredible amount of power to influence research by choosing who to fund and limiting who can access their black-box systems. |
I asked friend of the Sizzle and Australia’s greatest science journalist Jackson Ryan about this, and he said this problem isn’t limited to social media researchers: |
I'd say in general, conflict of Interests in science are very, very poorly disclosed and I suspect there is little review of COIs during peer review processes in many journals. I can give you a dozen examples in life sciences, medical sciences, tech and engineering where there are clear conflicts of interest that do not get disclosed, some of which I have emailed the authors and publishers about even this week!!!! In that sense, I am not surprised to see this in social media research. | | | | Jackson Ryan via email |
|
|
Discuss in Slack or Forum. |
Australian rocket startup's valuation soaring (higher than its vessels) |
Gilmour Space has cemented its status as a unicorn, locking in a valuation of more than $1 billion in its latest funding round (SmartCompany). As you might remember, Gilmour's previous achievement was a 14 second maiden flight. This was apparently enough to convince investors to chip in $217m in funding, including the $75 million from the National Reconstruction Fund which is paid by you, the taxpayer (NRFC). This comes amid a big rush of money into the global space sector and, maybe, a SpaceX IPO (Reuters). |
Discuss in Slack or Forum. |
Not even Apple gets the Apple Vision Pro |
With Meta backing away from the metaverse (TechCrunch), I liked this impassioned blog from stud tech analyst Stratechery's Ben Thompson about how Apple doesn't understand the AVP. He says the company's sports content is built for TV (lots of cuts between cameras, etc) which is flashy but terrible for VR, rather than staying in one position and letting people look around which is the point of VR. Have you ever watched anything in VR? Is there something that you think would be a "killer app" viewing experience? Let me know! |
Discuss in Slack or Forum. |
Leftovers |
Australia: |
|
Rest of World: |
|
Discuss in Slack or Forum. |
|
Oh, Also |
Your group chat messages are not legally binding contracts, UK court finds |
A UK court has ruled that, no, your shitposts in a group chat are not legally binding (Archive). This came up in divorce proceedings where a soon-to-be-bankrupt husband said in a message to his wife that he was signing over the house to her, something that she would later claim was an official contract. |
The wife's lawyer's argument was that having the husband's name in the header above the message counted as a legal signature. The judge disagreed: "I consider that the header within a WhatsApp ‘chat’ identifying the sender is analogous to the email address that is added by the relevant service provider to the top of an email, utilising the sender’s email address...It is, I consider, therefore, properly to be regarded as incidental to the message itself, rather than as forming part thereof." |
A follow-up from me: would a newsletter count asfue a contract? Shall we find out? |
Discuss in Slack or Forum. |
|
Bargains |
Electronics |
|
Computing |
|
|
The End |
😎 The Sizzle is written by Cam Wilson and emailed every weekday. It was created by Anthony “decryption” Agius. |
🤖 We love robots at the Sizzle but this newsletter has always been and will always be written by humans for humans. Also by Aussies for Aussies — so all prices are in dollarydoos, of course. |
🗣️ Have any feedback, a tip or just want to chat? Send me an email or Signal message. I promise to reply! |
💬 Want to hang out with other Sizzlers? There’s a subscriber-only Slack server and forum if you want to procrastinate and chat about tech-related news. |
🌐 The Sizzle is on Bluesky, Mastodon and LinkedIn if you’re feeling social. |
💳 Paid subscriber looking to manage your billing info, change email address or cancel your subscription? Visit the Beehiiv customer portal. |
🎁 Make someone's day and gift them a 12 month gift subscription to The Sizzle. |
💔 Don’t want this any more? I won’t take it personally. There’s a unsubscribe button at the bottom of this email or here’s a guide. |
🦺 The Sizzle has been tested to meet and exceed ISO 3533 standards. |
Always Was, Always Will Be Aboriginal Land |
The Sizzle is created on Gadigal land and acknowledges the traditional owners of country throughout Australia, recognising their continuing connection to land, water and community. I pay my respect to them and their cultures and to elders both past and present. |